Legal Opinion

Garrigan v. Incorporated Village

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*401In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated November 13, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In response to the defendants’ prima facie showing, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he had a contract with the defendant Incorporated Village of Málveme to compensate him for certain accumulated but unused benefits upon his retirement from his position…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Antonopoulou v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Clift v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Rubinstein v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Coates v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Gendalia v. GioffreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrigan v. Incorporated VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API