Doe v. Marshall
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REASONS FOR GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COWAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated herein, the Court has concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from barring plaintiff from interscholastic competition and restraining the defendant McKenzie from denying to the plaintiff the right to participate in interscholastic athletics, particularly football, during the school year 1978-79. The reasons for the granting of this relief are set forth herein.
Essential Facts
The parties have appeared, introduced evidence, and on the basis of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Jack A. Kampmeier v. Ewald Nyquist, in His Capacity as Commissioner of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United Handicapped Federation v. AndreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- University Interscholastic League v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Georgia Ass'n of Retarded Citizens v. McDanielDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
- Gladys J. v. Pearland Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Gary B. v. CroninDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.