Legal Opinion

Radford v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1944No. 13566PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

Appellant’s suit, as plaintiff in the trial court upon jury hearing, resulted in defendants’ ' judgment and this appeal. His petition alleged a cause of action on dual grounds: (1) Formal trespass to try title; (2) for establishment of an equitable vendor’s lien and foreclosure thereof upon lots 14 and IS, block 2, Cedar Oaks Addition to the City of Dallas; plaintiff having furnished purchase price for the lots, but title thereto taken in the name of defendants without reservation of a contractual vendor’s lien in the deeds. Defendants claimed the described property to be a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Insurance Company v. EastmanTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gilbert v. OdumTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gus. Lewy & Co. v. FischlTexas Supreme Court · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Royal v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Donsavage EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. JacksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Coleman v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. United States v. Lela DenbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API