State v. Carter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree under Minn. Stat. § 609.344(c) (1976) (using force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration), and was sentenced by the trial court to a limited maximum prison term of 5 (instead of 10) years. On his direct appeal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on force or coercion, contends that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of the fear experienced by the complainant after the alleged criminal act, and claims that the prosecutor committed…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.