Legal Opinion
Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1990No. C4-89-1521PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Appellant corporations appeal from a summary judgment, arguing the trial court erred by determining they were not properly dissolved in accordance with statutory procedures. The trial court determined that because appellants were not properly dissolved, the respondent Department of Human Services could pursue its claims against appellants for alleged medical assistance overpayments. We affirm the court’s determination regarding four of the *705appellant corporations, but reverse as to the other six.
FACTS
Appellants are 10 health care centers which were incorporated under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawrence Rice and Walter Chipman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Kopio's, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Electronic Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Rasmussen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990