Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Inhabitants of Westport

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of contract to recover the sum of $638, being the amount of a tax upon the plaintiff’s poll and personal property assessed against him for the year 1878, and paid by him under a protest in writing.

At the trial, the plaintiff offered evidence tending to show, and we must assume for the purposes of this hearing, that, on May 1, 1878, he was an inhabitant of Little Compton in the State of Rhode Island. But it was admitted that the plaintiff kept in Westport certain horses and neat cattle taxable in that town under the Gen. Sts. c. 11, § 12, cl. 3, which provides that “horses,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Westhampton v. SearleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Little v. GreenleafMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. City of Charlestown v. County Commissioners of MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Central National Bank v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. City of Boston v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Ingram v. CowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Foley v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API