Wysinger v. Crookshank
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, Orookshank, a teacher of *589a public school located in the city of Visalia school district, of the county of Tulare, to admit the plaintiff as a scholar. The application was denied, and from the judgment rendered therein, and an order refusing a new trial, this appeal is prosecuted.
The only ground for the refusal of the teacher to admit the applicant to the public school as a pupil is, as stated by the former, that the father of the petitioner, “ on October 1, 1888, came to me at the public school in Visalia with a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tape v. HurleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gong Lum v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Piper v. Big Pine School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Briggs v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1951
- Westminster School Dist. of Orange County v. MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.