Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentCanady, J.
Because I conclude that there is no basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction, I would discharge this case. Contrary to the view adopted by the majority, the decision of the First District in State v. Gainesville Woman Care, LLC, 187 So.3d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), does not expressly and directly conflict with North Florida Women’s Health & Counseling Services, Inc. v. State, 866 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2003), or In re T.W., 551 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1989). In view of the majority’s decision on jurisdiction, I write to explain why the First District’s decision should be affirmed on procedural grounds.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In re T.W.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Fla. Dept. of Rev. v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.