Legal Opinion

Becker v. Lorello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

-Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs. Memorandum: In order that the plaintiff should recover from the defendant the sum paid by him on account of the purchase price as well as his expenses in examining title, it was necessary for plaintiff to put the defendant in default by tendering the balance of the purchase money on the date provided in the contract. This the plaintiff wholly failed to do. Further he did not prove that the defendant would have been unable to convey the property to him had he made the tender. All concur. (The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rubin v. PugatchNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API