Legal Opinion

VIROEN v. Schaffner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 11, 1973No. 56893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves appellants’ claim for refund of sales taxes paid under protest. We have jurisdiction because this case involves construction of the revenue laws of the state and for the additional reason that questions of constitutional construction are presented.

Appellants sell fresh fruit through vending machines which deliver one piece of fruit when a purchaser deposits 10⅜⅜. No sale exceeds 10$⅞ and there is no way to determine whether a person purchases more than one item. No sales tax is collected from the purchaser.

Since 1965, appellants have been filing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Farm and Home Savings Ass'n v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Mid-America Television Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Pipe Fabricators, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Conservation Commission v. LePageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API