Legal Opinion
Leytman v. Glass
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
*551The determination that the petitioner wilfully and without good cause violated work relief rules by failing to report to his worksite was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Tillman v Fahey, 53 NY2d 815; Matter of Van Leuvan v Blum, 73 AD2d 1003). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Leuvan v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Tillman v. FaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981