Legal Opinion

Covington v. Comstock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

IN érror to the District Court of th'e'United States'for the.Northern District of Mississippi. An action was instituted in the District Court of Mississippi, by the defendant in error, on a promissory note, dated at New. York, March 2, 1836, by which Covington and M'Morris promised to pay four thousand five.'hundred and sixty dollars and four cents, six months after date, to Nelson, Carleton, and Company, at New York.

Read the full summary

IN érror to the District Court of th'e'United States'for the.Northern District of Mississippi. An action was instituted in the District Court of Mississippi, by the defendant in error, on a promissory note, dated at New. York, March 2, 1836, by which Covington and M'Morris promised to pay four thousand five.'hundred and sixty dollars and four cents, six months after date, to Nelson, Carleton, and Company, at New York. The noté was endorsed .by the drawees to the defendant in error, David A. Comstock. The declaration on the note omits, to state the place where the. 'note was payable; and on…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M'Lean

This case is brought before this Court from the Circuit Court of Mississippi, by a writ of e,rror.

The plaintiff in the Circuit Court brought his action on a promissory note, and stated in his'declaration, that the defendant, “heretofore, to wit, on the second day of March, 1836, at New York, to wit, in. the district aforesaid, made a certain- note in writing, com monly called a promissory note, bearing date the day and year last aforesaid, .and then and there delivered the said note to Nelson, Carleton & Co., who are citizens of the state' of.New York; by which said note, the said defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Head v. Texas State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Damarin v. Young Bros.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sumner v. Ford & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1841
  4. Adams v. RutherfordOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Orr v. HopkinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API