Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidgall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 8, 1973No. 1 CA-CR 532, 1 CA-CR 533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

In June of 1972, appellants, after a jury trial in Maricopa County, were convicted of the crime of depositing or exploding an explosive device on, in or near a building where persons inhabited, frequented or passed. A.R.S. § 13-922. They were each sentenced to the state prison for a term of not less than eight nor more than ten years. Appellants raise four issues on appeal, namely: (1) were their Miranda rights violated; (2) were the pretrial identifications a violation of due process or invalid due to the absence of counsel; (3) were the in-court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. BranchArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. DudgeonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TresizeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LeMattyArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. PigfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Felix v. CardwellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API