Legal Opinion
Wilson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 20, 1932No. 4616PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
The defendant in the case of the United States against the Democratic League of Delaware made an appropriate motion to suppress evidence which.il was averred had been illegally obtained. In the course of the hearing of this motion, Harold D. Wilson was called as a witness. He testified inter alia that he had entered the premises of the defendant by means of a key which had been furnished him by a member of the league. He was asked upon cross-examination, “Who was the member?” This question he refused to answer; was directed by the trial court to answer; and was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re Quarles and ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Fraternal Order of Eagles, No. 778 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Priestly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.