Legal Opinion

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint and for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint consists of six alleged causes of action, each involving a separate shipment of sugar having its origin on the railway operated by the defendant, and each shipment being consigned to the plaintiff. The allegations in each count are identical, with the exception of the difference in dates, figures, amounts and places of shipments, and the following essential allegations are typical of all: That as a common…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Ward v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Kent v. Hudson River Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. American Locomotive Co. v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Steinberg v. Erie RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API