Legal Opinion
Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.
The mistakes committed by the Telephone Company employees in disconnecting plaintiffs telephone did not reach the *1056level of gross negligence or willful misconduct required to create liability under the tariff provisions filed with the New York Public Service Commission. (Hamilton Employment Serv. v New York Tel. Co., 253 NY 468; Long Is. Cent. Sta. v New York Tel. Co., 54 AD2d 893; Warren v New York Tel. Co., 70 Misc 2d 794; Eisner v New York Tel. Co., 67 Misc 2d 506; see, also, 58A NY Jur,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamilton Employment Service, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Long Island Central Station, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Warren v. New York Telephone Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Eisner v. New York Telephone Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. CCT Communications, Inc. (In Re CCT Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Veals v. Consolidated Edison Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982