Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Owen Cox
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1992No. 91-5638, 91-5847PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant, Robert Cox, was convicted of knowingly transmitting in interstate commerce a communication containing a threat. 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). On appeal, Cox argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the trial court erred in certain evidentiary rulings.
Upon a review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s claims of error are without merit, and we affirm.
I
Cox was delinquent in his truck loan payments owed to Cumberland Federal Savings Bank, and, on July 3, 1990, the bank directed General Adjusting Service, Inc., to repossess the truck.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Russell KelnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Reginald J. HolzerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Frank L. HookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Leon CombsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael PriceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Richard C. HimelwrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Willie F. Critton, Jr. (93-4391) Janet L. Livingston (93-4392) and Leslie E. Livingston (93-4393)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.