Legal Opinion

Puchalski v. New Jersey State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, an indigent prisoner, brought this action to review the denial of assignment of counsel to represent him in connection with a parole release consideration hearing.

The Parole Board may release a prisoner on parole only if “it is of the opinion that there is reasonable probability that,'if such prisoner is released, he will assume his proper and rightful place in society, without violation of the law, and that his release is not incompatible with the welfare of society.” N. J. S. A. 30:4 — 123.14. In connection with his appearance at the Board 'hearing to determine such fitness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. O'NEAL v. NJ State Parole BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. State v. DalongesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Monks v. NJ State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. ABDUL-MALIK MUHAMMAD VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API