Legal Opinion
United States v. Griswold
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 10, 1885PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Motion for leave to enter satisfaction of judgment. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
By section 3469, Rev. St., it is provided as follows:
“ Upon a report by a district attorney, or any special attorney or agent having charge of any claim in favor of the United States, showing in detail the condition of such claim, and tlie terms upon which the same may be compromised, and recommending that it be compromised on the terms so offered, and upon tlie recommendation of the solicitor of the treasury, tlie secretary of the treasury is authorized to compromise such claim accordingly.”
The district attorney now applies for leave, under this section, to enter satisfaction of the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- United States v. LancasterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1821
- United States v. GriswoldUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Grubbs v. KannegantiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Carol Rae Cooper Foulds v. Texas Tech UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.