Gabriele v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this action alleges that his employment with defendant was terminated because of his age. Although there are several theories stated in the complaint which plaintiff believes entitle him to relief, the sole theory which would give this Court jurisdiction is the claim that plaintiff’s termination was a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment urging that plaintiff’s admitted failure to file a complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mrs. Roger McMillan REEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ATLANTA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Joe E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALLEY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Virginia L. GOGER, Appellant, v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quinn v. Bowmar Publishing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Pandis v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Clement GABRIELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Evans v. Oscar Mayer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.