Legal Opinion

State v. Larkins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1998No. 97-K-2898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JjSCHOTT, Chief Judge.

We grant certiorari in order to consider the validity of a ruling of the trial court denying relator’s motion to quash his indictment on the ground that his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated. Whether relator’s right to a speedy trial has been violated is determined by a four part test: the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant’s assertion of his right and prejudice to the defendant. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).

In the case now before us the time period between the filing of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. WillisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. State v. ShortsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. C.W. W.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API