Legal Opinion

International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. Buxbaum

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 10933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This case is now before the Court on remand from the Court of Appeals. 210 F.2d 384. A careful review of the entire proceedings in this case in the light of the opinion of the Court of Appeals has been made.1 Accordingly, Findings of Fact Nos. 1 to 17 inclusive and Conclusion of Law No. 1 (filed March 19, 1953) are reaffirmed; Findings of Fact Nos. 18, 19, 20 and 21 and Conclusions of Law Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are hereby vacated and set aside, and in place thereof I do hereby make the following:

Findings of Fact

18. Although at the time of the accident defendant did not have a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co. Foster v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Landis Tool Co., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. International Derrick & Equipment Company v. Henry R. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API