International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. Buxbaum
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This case is now before the Court on remand from the Court of Appeals. 210 F.2d 384. A careful review of the entire proceedings in this case in the light of the opinion of the Court of Appeals has been made.1 Accordingly, Findings of Fact Nos. 1 to 17 inclusive and Conclusion of Law No. 1 (filed March 19, 1953) are reaffirmed; Findings of Fact Nos. 18, 19, 20 and 21 and Conclusions of Law Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are hereby vacated and set aside, and in place thereof I do hereby make the following:
Findings of Fact
18. Although at the time of the accident defendant did not have a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co. Foster v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Landis Tool Co., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- International Derrick & Equipment Company v. Henry R. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956