Coffman v. McKee
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; John E. Martinecm, Chancellor; The modification asked should have been made. 127 Ark. 28. The decree is right; the modification should be denied. 127 Ark. 28.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The parties to this litigation are stockholders in the Arkansas Anthracite Coal Company, a domestic corporation, and the question at issue is the extent to which the stock of appellees is preferred over that of appellants. The corporation was organized to acquire certain coal lands, but before the purchase, of these lands, certain of the subscribers for the corporation’s stock became dissatisfied, whereupon a circular letter was prepared by Messrs. Remmel and Rose, of Little Rock, who were interested in promoting the corporation, and mailed to these stockholders. This letter satisfied the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Coffman v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917