Claim of Dose v. Moehle Lithographic Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Moehle Lithographic Company and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 1st day of December, 1916.
1Opinion of the Court
Cochrane, J.:
The employer was conducting a lithographing and printing business which is made a hazardous employment ■ under section 2, group 40, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 622). The employee was a bricklayer by occupation and was employed specially to point up one of the walls of the building wherein the business of the employer was conducted and to repair some cracks in the wall. He was paid six dollars a day for his labor and four dollars a day for a helper to be provided by himself. The employer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Bargey v. . Massaro MacAroni Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Mulford v. A. S. Pettit & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Aylesworth v. Phœnix Cheese Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Matter of Newman v. . NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Bargey v. Massaro Macaroni Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.