Legal Opinion · Dissent
Canal Insurance v. Harrison
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1988No. 76719Published
1DissentBeasley, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The evidence is to be viewed most favorably toward Harrison, see Eddie Parker Interests v. Booth, 160 Ga. App. 15, 17 (285 SE2d 753) (1981).
1. Appellant claims that there was no evidence at trial that an agency relationship existed between it and Allied. It asserts that there was no evidence that its “conduct, representations, course of dealing, or knowledge of material facts” led Harrison to believe that such an agency relationship existed and that this, coupled with denial of agency by Canal and Allied, required a finding of no agency as a matter of law.
Contrary to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wright Body Works, Inc. v. Columbus Interstate Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Salters v. Pugmire Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- European Bakers, Ltd. v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.