Legal Opinion

Gage v. Banner Health

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01133Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mally Gage, No. CV-24-01133-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Banner Health, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Mally Gage’s “Motion for Stay to Amend Procedural 17 Restrictions for Equitable Treatment of Pro Se Litigants.” (Doc. 33). 18 The Court will deny Ms. Gage’s Motion. While district courts have “wide discretion 19 in controlling discovery,” Little v. City of Seattle,

863 F.2d 681, 685

(9th Cir. 1988) 20 (specifically addressing stays of discovery), a party seeking a stay must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Michael R. Wood, Individually and Dba National Photo Services v. Willard W. McEwen Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API