In re Kyle T.

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent neglected her child (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]), and Family Court’s finding of neglect is not against the weight of the evidence. Petitioner established that the child had 45 illegal absences during the 1995-1996 school year, and respondent admitted that she removed her child from school without providing alternate schooling. Such proof established educational neglect (see, Matter of Jovann B., 153 AD2d…