Legal Opinion

Butzlaff v. State Department of Health & Family Services

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 17, 1998No. 98-0453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

This appeal requires us to construe § 103.10(13), Stats., the provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that governs civil actions under the act. The trial court interpreted § 103.10(13) to permit an employee to file an action for damages for violations of the FMLA regardless of whether the employee had been successful in the administrative proceeding specified in § 103.10(12). The court therefore denied the motion of the Wisconsin Department of Health.and Family Services (DHFS) to dismiss Steven Butzlaffs action for damages, even though the personnel commission had decided, after…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. SampleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GisvoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. German v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Scocos v. State Department of Veteran AffairsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. Laska v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  5. Butzlaff v. State Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API