Manhattan Oil Co. v. Gill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Thomas Gill and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 17th day of July, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the. 18th day of July, 1906, denying the said defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes,
1Opinion of the Court
Milleb, J .:
This is an action at law to recover the purchase price of certain goods alleged to have been sold to the defendants as partners. ' The partnership is denied. The defendants are the beneficiaries under the will of Thomas Gill, deceased, which contained a provision directing his executors to continue his business until his youngest son should reach the age of twenty-one yearg. The business was conducted by the defendant George 8. Gill, as administrator with the will annexed, the executor having died. Said youngest son, the defendant Thomas Gill, became of age February 18, 1899, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Stewart v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Columbus Watch Co. v. HodenpylNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Saperstein v. . UllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re GlassNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of BlaszkiewiczNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of DavisonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of KinreichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Kilhoffer v. ZeisNew York Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.