Herdguard, LLC v. NXT Generation Pet, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON HERDGUARD, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) 5:16-cv-468-JMH-EBA ) NXT GENERATION PET, INC., et ) MEMORANDUM OPINION al., ) AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) *** This matter is before the Court upon the motion of Plaintiff Herdguard, LLC, for attorneys’ fees. [DE 119]. Herdguard argues that they are contractually entitled to attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in this action for breach of contract. In response, Defendant NXT Generation Pet, Inc., does not dispute that Herdguard is contractually entitled to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. J & L Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. IMO Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.