State v. Boyington
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
The jury returned a verdict finding defendant guilty of rape but not guilty of sodomy, and fixed punishment at 11 years which the trial court reduced to 6 years. Defendant presents three points on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in accepting a verdict which is inherently contradictory; (2) that the trial court failed to give a mandatory instruction; and (3) that the admission of samples of defendant’s handwriting was error because the exhibits were hearsay and not within the business records exception. None of these exceptions can be sustained.
The State’s primary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alexander Bisno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Loper v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Standard Oil Company of California v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- State v. SalleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- State v. AmersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. LasleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.