Lembeck v. Gerken
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On defendant’s rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The defendant seeks a new trial in this case chiefly for the reason that under the law applicable to the undisputed facts therein, the trial judge should have ordered a nonsuit or directed a verdict for the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $6,000.- The action was one for deceit. The defendant made a contract with one Matthew F. Smith, the undisclosed agent of the plaintiff, whereby the defendant agreed to convey to Smith a block of land, designated as block 36 on a map of the Atlantic Coast *113Realty Company at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dawe v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Medivox Prod., Inc. v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Township of Springfield v. BensleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Hart v. ZaitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Comfort Spring Corp. v. Brooks Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.