Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2012No. SD 31511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

Mark Mitchell, who was convicted of DWI in a bench-tried case, takes issue with docket sheets used to prove his “chronic offender” status; i. e., that he had pleaded guilty to or had been found guilty of at least four intoxication-related traffic offenses. See § 577.023.1(2)(a), RSMo Supp.2009.

We need not reach Mitchell’s rather technical docket sheet complaints. His driving record, which was admitted without objection, plainly listed four DWI convictions and thus established that he pleaded guilty to or was found guilty of those offenses. State v. Collins, 328 S.W.3d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. LemonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. SHEENA DARLENE CORDELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM ALBERT RATTLESMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State of Missouri v. Sidney L. Clark IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API