Legal Opinion

Bell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 7, 1965No. 14594PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

This suit was brought by appellant, T. J. Bell, to recover workmen’s compensation benefits. After the jury reached its verdict, the verdict was duly accepted and filed in the cause.

Appellee, The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and moved the trial court to enter judgment in favor of appellant, disregarding the answer of the jury to Special Issue No. 1, and to find, as a matter of law, that appellant was totally disabled temporarily from January 25, 1963, the date of his injury, to March 13, 1963. The trial court disregarded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Strauss v. LaMarkTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jenkins v. HenniganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Whiteside v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Whitehurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  2. Tower Contracting Co., Inc. of Tex. v. Burden Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Herrera v. Balmorhea Feeders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Barras v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Webb v. JornsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API