Legal Opinion
Garber v. Randell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1973No. 70 Civ. 835PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge.
Defendant White & Case has moved for a severance of the claims brought against it pursuant to Rules 20(b), 21, and 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Before considering the merits of White & Case’s motion, a review of the tangled and complex procedural history of this motion seems appropriate.
On April 20, 1972, this court ordered the filing of a consolidated amended complaint by plaintiffs in three separate actions, each of which related to the financial affairs of National Student Marketing Corporation (“NSM”).2 The order further provided that it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garber v. RandellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Scott v. GoodmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- In re National Student Marketing LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,931 Louis Garber v. Cortes W. Randell, Mildred Lipsig v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Domenick L. Natale v. National Student Marketing Corporation, and White & CaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973