Legal Opinion
Ericksen, Krentel & Barre v. Pizzolato Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1983No. 82 CA 0683PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
432 So.2d 386 (1983)
ERICKSEN, KRENTEL AND BARRÉ
v.
PIZZOLATO FORD-LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC. and D'Spain-Field Ford, Inc.
No. 82 CA 0683.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
May 17, 1983.
Ronald G. Coleman, Law Offices of Walton J. Barnes, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff Ericksen, Krentel and Barré.
William C. Shockey, McCollister, McCleary, Fazio, Mixon, Holliday & Hicks, Attys. at Law, Baton Rouge, for defendants and third party plaintiffs, Pizzolato Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
John L. Dardenne, Jr., Kennon, White & Odom, Attys. at Law, Baton Rouge, for defendants and third party defendants,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henry v. Ballard & Cordell Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Dockson Gas Co. v. S. W. Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Henry v. Ballard & Cordell Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Cameron Meadows Land Co. v. BullardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Monsur v. ChaddickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. KnightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Carter v. Financial Advisor & ConsultantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Piper v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Lapeze v. Amoco Production Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1987