Fort Smith, Subiaco & Rock Island Railroad v. Moore
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). As above stated, it was conceded by counsel for the plaintiff that the suit was brought under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act, and that the plaintiff’s right to recover was based upon that act.
Upon the former appeal it was earnestly insisted that the defendant was not guilty of negligence in any respect. This court, under the facts proved at the first trial, held that, under the evidence of the plaintiff, the jury might find that the negligence of the engineer consisted, in backing the engine and tender with the four cars attached thereto against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Vaughan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Railway Co. v. SweetSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Saint Louis-San Francisco Rd. Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. RemelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. BenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932