Legal Opinion

Angelus Associates Corp. v. Neonex Leisure Products, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1985No. G000178PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

May a nonsettling defendant retailer in a products liability action pursue a cross-complaint for total equitable indemnity against the defendant manufacturer despite the latter’s good faith settlement with the plaintiff (Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6)? Yes.

I

Larry Wilkerson and Anthony Hewitson were injured in a motor home explosion in 1977, allegedly caused by a propane gas leak in a defective heating unit. They sued numerous defendants, including the manufacturer of the vehicle, Neonex Leisure Products, Inc.; the manufacturer of the heating unit, Essex Group, Inc.; the supplier…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Nucorp Energy Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1987
  5. In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API