Legal Opinion
Batt v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 2007No. A114633PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Plaintiff Angel Batt appeals from the order sustaining a general demurrer to those portions of her complaint that purported to state class action claims for refund of a San Francisco tax plaintiff alleged was erroneously collected from a class she proposed to represent. The trial court sustained the demurrer on the ground that San Francisco law does not allow class action suits to recover taxes. We hold that this conclusion was correct, and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
On January 20, 2006, plaintiff filed her complaint for herself “individually and on behalf of all persons similarly…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007