Peacock v. City of Miami
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a general demurrer and special demurrers to the bill of complaint and dismissing the bill.
Demurrer was filed by the defendant.
While the demurrers were pending the original complainant, John Palmer Corell died and the suit was revived by an order of Court as follows:
‘ ‘ This cause coming on this day to be further heard upon the motion of Harry B. Peacock as administrator of the estate of John Palmer Corell, deceased, and George Philip Corell and Adam Wesley Corell for an order reviving the said cause in the names of said movants as complainant, and it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Davis v. . CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Clark v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Walker v. HallettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- Good v. NorleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quigley v. CreminSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Mallory Steamship Co. v. Baker & Holmes Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Moore v. AvriettSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Moore v. AvriettSupreme Court of Florida · 1929