Legal Opinion

Day Wood Heel Co. v. Rover

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1931No. 22373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This action is based upon an alleged breach of a contract of lease to deliver up the premises, at the end of the term, in as good order as they were at the time of the execution of the lease, “damage by fire and other unavoidable casualty excepted.”

It may here be noted that two actions were instituted between the same parties, growing out of the destruction by fire of the leased premises — this action and one in tort. The discussion of this ease will be confined to the alleged breach of the covenant of the lease, without prejudice to the rights of the parties in the action ex delicto pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1911
  2. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Crystal Spring Distillery Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
  4. Central Line of Boats v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Monterey Corporation v. Hart, Ex'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  4. Sannit v. AaronsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. T and N Master Builder and RevovatorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API