Commonwealth v. Marshall
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
A jury convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree based on a theory of deliberate premeditation. The defendant has appealed from the conviction, claiming that the *359judge erred in denying his motions for a required finding of not guilty, and made numerous reversible errors in her evidentiary rulings. He also requests that we exercise our plenary power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, to reduce the degree of guilt. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the conviction and decline to exercise our power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E.
1. Background. We summarize the facts in the light most…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HelfantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ClementeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. LintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.