Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Harbin v. Harbin

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 2, 2011No. 2100596Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBryan, Judge

This is a postdivorce proceeding that involves the proposed relocation of the principal residence of the seven-year-old child born during the marriage of Matthew D. Harbin (“the father”) and Augustine B. Harbin Steed (“the mother”). The Mobile Circuit Court overruled the father’s objection to the proposed relocation of the child, and a majority of this court has affirmed that ruling after determining that the mother overcame the presumption found in § 30-3-169.4, Ala.Code 1975, i.e., that a change of the child’s principal residence is not in the best interest of the child. Because my review…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knight v. KnightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API