Legal Opinion

Ford v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1924No. 15392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The courts of Georgia have no extraterritorial jurisdiction, and can not make a citizen of another State amenable to their process, or conclude him by a judgment in personam, without his consent; and where such a judgment was rendered in this State against a citizen of the State of Tennessee, upon whom no personal service of process was made within this State, and who did not appear, but who was served by a publication of summons, the judgment was void. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714 (2) (24 L. ed. 565); Dearing v. Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497 (5); Bank of Floral City v. Warnock, 144 Ga.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Weston v. BeverlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Bank of Floral City v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Aldrich v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Fordesh v. RackleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Shelton v. Stone & Sons Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API