Beeber v. Berber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The showing in the affidavits herein upon which the order of arrest of October 11, 1927, was made was sufficient in view of defendant’s previous conduct. The separation decree continued in full force and effect, both with respect to the period before the alleged reconciliation and the period after the alleged reconciliation, so long as no order revoking the decree was made pursuant to section 1165 of the Civil Practice Act, which section provides the exclusive method of revoking or terminating a decree of separation. (Hobby v. Hobby, 5…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hallow v. HallowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hobby v. HobbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Jones v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Lawrence v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schatzberg v. SchatzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Lowe v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Sacknoff v. SacknoffNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Granchelli v. GranchelliNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Estate of GranchelliNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.