Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Company v. Wingate
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 24, 1973No. Civ. 70-886-BPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, District Judge.
This declaratory judgment action arises out of a suit now pending in the Superior Court of Baltimore City. Kursch v. Wingate, Docket 1968, Folio 774, File No. 112110. In that case, damages are claimed for injuries sustained by Mr. Kursch when a truck operated by him was struck by a Hertz rental car alleged to have been negligently operated by Wingate. At the time of the accident, there was in effect a policy of liability insurance issued by Royal Indemnity providing coverage to Hertz and permissive users. After investigation, however, Royal Indemnity concluded that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Fox v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- United States Fire Insurance v. MerrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- James River Insurance v. Kemper Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Reasor v. City of Norfolk, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. EakinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.