Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alfa Mutual General Ins. Co. v. Oglesby

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1997No. 1960928Published

1Dissent

I must respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court erred in directing a verdict for Oglesby on Alfa's misrepresentation claim that was based on § 27-14-7, Ala. Code 1975. The majority states that the legislature intended this statute to apply only to initial policies. Because the insured is seeking to recover under a renewal of the original policy, the majority holds that the statute regarding misrepresentation does not apply. I disagree. Nothing in § 27-14-7 indicates that it applies only to the initial application and the initial policy:

"(a) All statements and descriptions in any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company v. William Wayne Oliver and Patricia Katherine OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Clark v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. State Farm General Insurance v. OliverDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
  4. Hess v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Amerson v. GardnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API