Alfa Mutual General Ins. Co. v. Oglesby
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I must respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court erred in directing a verdict for Oglesby on Alfa's misrepresentation claim that was based on § 27-14-7, Ala. Code 1975. The majority states that the legislature intended this statute to apply only to initial policies. Because the insured is seeking to recover under a renewal of the original policy, the majority holds that the statute regarding misrepresentation does not apply. I disagree. Nothing in § 27-14-7 indicates that it applies only to the initial application and the initial policy:
"(a) All statements and descriptions in any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company v. William Wayne Oliver and Patricia Katherine OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Clark v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- State Farm General Insurance v. OliverDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
- Hess v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Amerson v. GardnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996