Legal Opinion

Nacco Materials Handling Group, Inc. v. Lilly Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 16, 2011No. 11-2415 AVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON YALE’S MOTION TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE

DIANE K. VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is the August 22, 2011 motion of the plaintiff, Nacco Materials Handling Group, Inc., d/b/a Yale Materials Handling Corporation (‘Yale”), pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to “prevent further spoliation” by the defendant, The Lilly Company (“Lilly”), of evidence stored on Lilly’s computers and elsewhere. In addition, Yale requests the court to award Yale its legal fees and costs incurred in conducting a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Lilly in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  4. Adkins v. WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. HATCH v. DEMAYODistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020
  3. In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Turner v. All Secure, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API