Legal Opinion

In re Koeppel

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1938No. 34302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The bankrupt has filed exceptions to the specifications which read as follows:

“As to the First. That same is insufficient in law on the face thereof, in that the claim upon which same is based is outlawed by the Statute of Limitations, and that same is otherwise insufficient in that it is not a good and valid objection to the granting of a discharge.
“As to the Second. That same is insufficient in law on the face thereof, in that the claim upon which same is based is outlawed by the Statute of Limitations, and that same is otherwise insufficient in that it is not a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. ArenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. In re McLaughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  4. In re TerensDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PettisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1941
  2. In re TurdoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API