State Ex Rel. McMinn v. Gentry
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Draper, C. J.
I agree that the relator is not entitled to a change of venue from the county in the contempt *623proceeding and that he is entitled to one in the main action.
So far as prohibition is concerned, it is a preventive writ which commands the person or tribunal to whom it is directed, to refrain from doing something which the court is informed he is about to do. 42 Am. Jur., Prohibition, § 2, p. 139. In this case the respondent is not threatening to do anything further either within or without his jurisdiction, unless by his refusal to grant the change of venue from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Harkness v. GleasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. McMinn v. GentryIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Gregg v. State ex rel. BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. GoshornIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Mock v. Whitley Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.